|
Post by Cecilie on Aug 29, 2019 9:24:49 GMT
Dear PsyToolkit users,
Thank you for this forum! I am curious to hear if anyone has experience with creating basic auditory reaction time tests in Psytoolkit? Specifically, I struggle with latency issues related to stimulus presentation. This is of course a well known problem across all types of software, but currently I get RT latencies well above 500 ms and I was hoping to be able to bring that down. Perhaps more importantly, I would be curious to hear of any (creative?) solutions to measuring such latencies in auditory as well as visual stimulus presentation.
I am using a simple variation (see below) of the code used to run the (visual) Deary-Liewald test (available in the library). I have tried calling .wav as well as .mp3 files. options set &maxResponseTime 3000 set &minInterval 1000 set &maxInterval 3000 sounds sound pinknoise.wav task dl_task_simple_aud keys space draw off show background 0 0 100 show bitmap box_cross draw on set $randomdelay random &minInterval &maxInterval delay $randomdelay sound sound readkey 1 &maxResponseTime clear 3 save BLOCKNAME &training $randomdelay RT STATUS block dlsimple_aud_real set &training 0 message readyrealdansk tasklist dl_task_simple_aud 20 end Any comments or suggestions would be much appreciated. Thanks very much. Cecilie
|
|
|
Post by PsyToolkit on Sept 6, 2019 8:55:14 GMT
Thank you for your question.
If you like, can you please send me your experiment via email (psytoolkit@gmx.com)?
|
|
|
Post by Cecilie on Sept 6, 2019 11:30:58 GMT
Thank you. I have shared it with you. I've managed to cut down RTs to appr. 300-400 ms, I assume by using (annoying - sorry) whitenoise stimuli and closing other running programs on the computer. It is still longer than expected, though, so any input would be wonderful. Thanks! Cecilie
|
|
|
Post by PsyToolkit on Sept 6, 2019 20:22:36 GMT
Yes, I got your email, and it works fine on my computer. Anyway, good to investigate. Also, there was just an interesting article published in PlosOne, which looked at the reliability of PsyToolkit compared to Eprime (and it found PsyToolkit to be highly reliable). That was using a psycholingistic task, so maybe that is useful to cite in your research project as well. Here is the link: journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comments?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0221802
|
|