|
Post by verena on Apr 17, 2020 10:29:24 GMT
Dear all,
we wanna use photographs of individual faces in our experiment. For Data protection regularities, we will need a password protection, a non-public url or something to have control over who has access to our study. Is there any technical solution/workaround for this?
thank you very much. Best wishes
Verena
|
|
|
Post by PsyToolkit on Apr 17, 2020 12:34:41 GMT
Hi Verena,
It is easy to do. Of course, your experiment needs to be embedded in a survey before it can start.
If you want that only some people with a password/code can do the survey (which has your experiment): 1) The survey URL is only known to the people you send it out to. 2) You can add as a first question in your survey a question to enter a code (that you can give them via letter, email, etc), as follows. You can force it to be a number by providing a min and max value (only whole numbers can be used in subsequent if then checks For example, you might choose number 12323 as your secret pass that people need to do the survey: Note that the jump question exists the survey if the number is not 12323. In computer languages, != means "is not"
l: enterpass t: textline q: Please enter the access code you have been given by the researchers. - {min=1,max=99999} Type the access code
l: t: jump
- if $enterpass != 12323 then end
l: nextquestion t: textline
q: You know the password, you are one of our selected people. What is your name? - Enter your name here:
l: myexperiment t: experiment - name_of_experiment
|
|
|
Post by verena on Apr 17, 2020 14:50:14 GMT
Thank you for your quick reply as a label "end" does not exist, I created a last survey page and jump to this. can I avoid this page after a normal experiment run?
|
|
|
Post by PsyToolkit on Apr 17, 2020 19:46:10 GMT
Hi, I just edit the example. If you write "then end" (in the magenta line in my answer above), you will go to the end of the survey.
In the upcoming version of PsyToolkit, there is an option not to have an end-page as well. That version is almost ready, but I think you can easily work around it with the solution given?
|
|